Head to head · Checked against vendor sites, September 2026
Noma Security vs Bloom Security: AI agent security compared
The verdict
Noma Security scores higher overall on our weights (7.5 vs 6.0 out of 10). Noma Security scores higher on tool-call control, footprint, identity and audit, maturity and breadth; Bloom Security scores higher on visibility. They tie on policy. Neither publishes list prices.
Bloom Security
Best for endpoint software and extension inventory
How do Noma Security and Bloom Security compare on each criterion?
| Criterion | Weight | Noma Security | Bloom Security | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visibility | 22% | 8 | 9 | Bloom Security |
Why these scoresNoma Security: Discovers endpoint agents such as Claude Code, Cursor and Codex with their MCP servers and skills. Bloom Security: Discovers software, extensions, AI tools and everything running on the endpoint, with who built it and what it can access. | ||||
| Tool-call control | 20% | 7 | 6 | Noma Security |
Why these scoresNoma Security: Blocks unauthorized and malicious agents and stops risky behavior at runtime; per-tool-call mechanics are described less specifically. Bloom Security: Defines what AI agents can access, execute and transmit and scales back overpermissioned MCP servers; runtime tool-call decisions not detailed. | ||||
| Policy | 15% | 7 | 7 | Tie |
Why these scoresNoma Security: Runtime inspection across the event, the session, the identity behind the agent and the data it reaches; action types beyond block not detailed. Bloom Security: Blocks malicious or policy-violating packages and skills across npm, Chrome Web Store and Open VSX. | ||||
| Identity and audit | 12% | 7 | 4 | Noma Security |
Why these scoresNoma Security: Keeps a live registry of allowed agents, MCP servers and skills and inspects the identity behind each agent. Bloom Security: Not described on the pages we reviewed. | ||||
| Footprint | 13% | 8 | 4 | Noma Security |
Why these scoresNoma Security: Discovers endpoint agents through existing EDR or MDM with no new endpoint agent to deploy. Bloom Security: Deployment method not published. | ||||
| Breadth | 8% | 9 | 5 | Noma Security |
Why these scoresNoma Security: Covers endpoint, SaaS and homegrown agents, plus AI-SPM and AI red teaming. Bloom Security: Endpoint focused, including non-AI software. | ||||
| Maturity | 10% | 7 | 4 | Noma Security |
Why these scoresNoma Security: SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 9001 and HIPAA listed; Gartner recognition cited by the vendor; pricing not published. Bloom Security: Limited public company information; SOC 2 listed; investors and pricing not published. | ||||
| Total | 100% | 7.5 | 6.0 | Noma Security |
How do they deploy, and what do they cost?
| Attribute | Noma Security | Bloom Security |
|---|---|---|
| Owner | Not acquired | Not acquired |
| How it reaches devices | Through existing EDR or MDM | Not published |
| Deployment detail | Noma states that it discovers agents, MCP servers and skills on employee endpoints through your existing EDR or MDM, with no new endpoint agent to deploy. SaaS and homegrown agent coverage connects through the platforms and environments where those agents run. | Not published on the pages we reviewed. |
| Pricing | Contact sales. Noma Security does not publish pricing. | Contact sales. Pricing is not published. |
Source: noma.security · Noma endpoint agents · Noma platform · bloom.security · Bloom about · Reviewed Sep 2026
Which should you choose?
Choose Noma Security if
- Your priority matches our designation for Noma Security: best for endpoint plus SaaS and homegrown agents.
- You want a light rollout with published deployment detail, ideally through existing EDR or MDM: Noma Security scores 8 to 4.
- Your agents also run in SaaS platforms, cloud workloads or apps you build: Noma Security scores 9 to 5.
Choose Bloom Security if
- Your priority matches our designation for Bloom Security: best for endpoint software and extension inventory.
- You need a fleet-wide inventory of AI agents, MCP servers, extensions and credentials on devices: Bloom Security scores 9 to 8.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Noma Security or Bloom Security?
Noma Security scores higher overall on our weights (7.5 vs 6.0 out of 10). Noma Security scores higher on tool-call control, footprint, identity and audit, maturity and breadth; Bloom Security scores higher on visibility. They tie on policy. Scores are editorial assessments from public vendor material, reviewed September 2026.
Do Noma Security and Bloom Security publish prices?
No. Neither publishes list prices, so ask both for a quote.
Do Noma Security or Bloom Security replace EDR?
No. The tools in this guide add control over AI agent actions and work alongside EDR. Noma Security: Through existing EDR or MDM. Bloom Security: Not published.
Related
Sources
- noma.security · Reviewed Sep 2026
- Noma endpoint agents · Reviewed Sep 2026
- Noma platform · Reviewed Sep 2026
- bloom.security · Reviewed Sep 2026
- Bloom about · Reviewed Sep 2026